ugliness not
while watching ugly betty on the telly tonight, me and the flatmate were commenting on how roles that seemed much more characterful had to be 'ugly'. it seemed the 'real' talent of an actress got clouded when she was too pretty. nicole kidman had to have a prosthetic nose to play virginia woolf in the hours. and hilary swank in million dollar baby, and boys don't cry? is plain-ness more acceptable, or familiar? somehow, a physical flaw needs to be made up by a powerful trait in personality before a character becomes credible.
and i wonder why that is, that i tend to identify with flawed characters much more readily.
and i wonder why that is, that i tend to identify with flawed characters much more readily.
2 Comments:
i think nobody would watch a movie starring an not-so-attractive actress of mediocre talent - but they would a beautiful one of even lesser talent. an actress can't be both less-than attractive and less-than talented.
yet, are flawed (physically and personality-wise) characters not more human than apparently perfect ones?
could it be that a perfectly beautiful actress is dismissed unconsciously as someone too perfect? and her skills become overlooked?
Post a Comment
<< Home